01.17.06

Bought: INTC @ $25.56

Posted in Investing at 12:07 pm by admin

Inline with my earlier post, I have placed a buy order for INTC at the market price of $25.56.

RSS feed | Trackback URI

9 Comments »

Comment by Anonymous
2006-01-18 00:31:05

How’s that working out for you?

 
Comment by G
2006-01-18 00:31:27

How’s that working out for you?

 
Comment by admin
2006-01-18 07:44:39

Considering afterhours it’s down 9.5%, I’m not bad. Lol. Seriously though, I still stand confident with my original reasoning. They are a good buy, perhaps now after this price drop more than ever.

We’ll see how it goes on when markets open in another two hours.

 
Comment by Anonymous
2006-01-18 23:00:29

That may be one of the worst stock picks I’ve ever seen - 1st da down 11%?

 
Comment by admin
2006-01-19 08:57:10

Yup it’s down 11%. I didn’t lose any sleep over it though. I may have lost some money in the short term, but I will make it back. To simply say “That may be one of the worst stock picks I’ve ever seen” seems somewhat uneducated to me. Out of 10 picks, three or four of them will be dogs. It’s just the nature of the game. I made four times in profit from selling SIRF than what I lost yesterday.

As an aside lesson, it’s important to have multiple streams of income at all times. Myself, yesterday I lost 11% on my INTC purchase yet at the same time I made double what I lost, back in Adsense earnings from my websites. So I ain’t complainin…

Comment by Anonymous
2007-10-08 12:15:16

Still down two years later.

 
 
Comment by Anonymous
2006-02-14 16:22:49

It’s working!

 
Comment by Steven Cole
2006-05-30 05:03:34

cool site

 
Comment by komik videolar
2008-06-19 13:07:07

Thanks for this great plugin! Works fine - only my old PDA doesn’t understand UTF-8 - most blogs are coded like this - so special characters aren’t displayed correctly.

 
Name
E-mail
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong> in your comment.